h-index bibliography (journal contributions) (307 papers)

Egghe L. On the relation between Schubert’s h-index of a single paper and its total number of received citations. Scientometrics, in press doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0062-6.

Saad G. Applying the h-index in exploring bibliometric properties of elite marketing scholars. Scientometrics, in press doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0069-z.

Ye F.Y., Rousseau R. Probing the h-core: an investigation of the tail–core ratio for rank distributions. Scientometrics, in press doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0099-6.

2010 (16 papers)

[539] Alonso S., Cabrerizo F.J., Herrera-Viedma E., Herrera F. q²-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2010) 23-28, doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.005.

[595] Alonso S., Cabrerizo F.J., Herrera-Viedma E., Herrera F. hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g- indices. Scientometrics 82 (2) (2010) 391-400. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5.

[589] Bodman A.R. Measuring the influentialness of economic geographers during the 'great half century': an approach using the h index. Journal of Economic Geography 10 (1) (2010) 141-156. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp061.

[585] Carbo-Dorca R. A monodimensional scientific performance measure: the h index, can be substituted by simple multidimensional descriptors?. Journal of the Mathematical Chemistry 47 (1) (2010) 548-550. doi:10.1007/s10910-009-9573-x.

[586] Chiu D.M., Fu T.Z.J. "Publish or Perish" in the Internet Age. A study of publication statistics in computer networking research. Computer Communication Review 40 (1) (2010) 34-43.

[540] Egghe L. The hirsch-index and related impact measures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 44 (2010).

[578] Egghe L. Characteristic scores and scales based on h-type indices. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2010) 14-22. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.001.

[572] Franceschini F., Maisano D. Analysis of the Hirsch index's operational properties. European Journal of Operational Research 203 (2) (2010) 494-504. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.001.

[576] Franceschini F., Maisano D. The Hirsch spectrum: A novel tool for analyzing scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2010) 64-73. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.08.003.

[591] Glanzel W., Schubert A. Hirsch-type characteristics of the tail of distributions. The generalised h-index. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2010) 118-123. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.002.

[579] Horne R., Petrie K.J., Wessely S. Christmas 2009-Professional Matters H-index pathology: implications for medical researchers and practitioners. British Medical Journal 339 (2010) b5356. doi:10.1136/bmj.b5356.

[592] Kousha K., Thelwall M., Rezaei S. Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2010) 124-135. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.003.

[593] MacRoberts M.H., MacRoberts B.R. Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (1) (2010) 1-12. doi:10.1002/asi.21228.

[575] Moussa S., Touzani M. Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2010) 107-117. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.001.

[577] Schreiber M. How to modify the g-index for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2010) 42-54. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.003.

[584] Schreiber M. Revisiting the g-Index: The Average Number of Citations in the g-Core. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (1) (2010) 169-174. doi:10.1002/asi.21218.

2009 (122 papers)

[493] Alonso S., Cabrerizo F.J., Herrera-Viedma E., Herrera F. h-index: A Review Focused in its Variants, Computation and Standardization for Different Scientific Fields. Journal of Informetrics 3 (4) (2009) 273-289. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.

[532] Arencibia-Jorge R. New indicators of institutional scientific performance based on citation analysis: the successive H indices . Revista Española de Documentacion Cientifica 32 (3) (2009) 101-106. doi:10.3989/redc.2009.3.692.

[506] Arencibia-Jorge R., Rousseau R. Influence of individual researchers' visibility on institutional impact: an example of Prathap's approach to successive h-indices. Scientometrics 79 (3) (2009) 507-516. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2025-0.

[587] Auffhammer M. The State of Environmental and Resource Economics: A Google Scholar Perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3 (2) (2010) 251-269. doi:10.1093/reep/rep001.

[485] Baldock C., Ma R.M., Orton C.G. The h index is the best measure of a scientist's research productivity. Medical Physics 36 (4) (2009) 1043-1045. doi:10.1118/1.3089421.

[557] Barcza K., Telcs A. Paretian publication patterns imply Paretian Hirsch index. Scientometrics 81 (2) (2009) 513-519. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2175-8.

[482] Bedeian A.G., Van Fleet D.D., Hyman H.H. Scientific achievement and editorial board membership . Organizational Research Methods 12 (2) (2009) 211-238. doi:10.1177/1094428107309312.

[514] Benway B.M., Kalidas P., Cabello J.M., Bhayani S.B. Does Citation Analysis Reveal Association Between h-Index and Academic Rank in Urology?. Urology 74 (1) (2009) 30-33. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.045.

[571] Bletsas A., Sahalos J.N. Hirsch Index Rankings Require Scaling and Higher Moment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (12) (2009) 2577-2586. doi:10.1002/asi.21197.

[198] Bornmann L., Daniel H.D. The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?. EMBO Reports 10(1) (2009) 2-6. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.233 .

[199] Bornmann L., Marx W., Schier H. Hirsch-type index values for organic chemistry journals: a comparison of new metrics with the Journal Impact Factor. European Journal of Organic Chemistry 10 (2009) 1471-1476. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200801243.

[213] Bornmann L., Marx W., Schier H., Rahm E., Thor A., Daniel H.D. Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry-Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts. Journal of Informetrics 3 (1) (2009) 27-35. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.001.

[496] Bornmann L., Mutz R., Daniel H.D. Do We Need the h Index and Its Variants in Addition to Standard Bibliometric Measures?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (6) (2009) 1286-1289. doi:10.1002/asi.21016.

[563] Bornmann L., Mutz R., Daniel H.D., Wallon G., Ledin A. Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data. Research Evaluation 18 (3) (2009) 185-190. doi:10.3152/095820209X466883.

[218] Bouabid H., Martin B.R. Evaluation of Moroccan research using a bibliometric-based approach: investigation of the validity of the h-index. Scientometrics 78 (2) (2009) 203-217. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2005-4.

[219] Burrell Q.L. Some Comments on "A Proposal for a Dynamic h-Type Index" by Rousseau and Ye. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (2) (2009) 418-419. doi:10.1002/asi.20969.

[233] Burrell Q.L. On Hirsch's h, Egghe's g and Kosmulski's h(2). Scientometrics 79 (1) (2009) 79-91. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0405-3.

[486] Castellano C., Radicchi F. On the fairness of using relative indicators for comparing citation performance in different disciplines. Archivum Immunologiae Et Therapiae Experimentalis 57 (2) (2009) 85-90. doi:10.1007/s00005-009-0014-0.

[522] Cervantes V.H., Santana A.C., Guilera G., Gomez-Benito J. Hierarchical linear models in psychiatry: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics 80 (3) (2009) 797-808. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2121-4.

[508] Chen C.M., Chen Y., Horowitz M., Hou H.Y., Liu Z.Y., Pellegrino D. Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery. Journal of Informetrics 3 (3) (2009) 191-209. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.004.

[516] Darmoni S.J., Ladner J., Devos P., Gehanno J.F. Reliability of a bibliometric tool used in France for hospital founding. Presse Medicale 38 (7-8) (2009) 1056-1061. doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2009.03.011.

[521] Deineko V.G., Woeginger G.J. A new family of scientific impact measures: The generalized Kosmulski-indices. Scientometrics 80 (3) (2009) 819-826. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2130-0.

[596] Dodson M.V. Citation analysis: Maintenance of h-index and use of e-index. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 387 (2009) 625-626. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.091.

[229] Egghe L. Mathematical study of h-index sequences. Information Processing & Management 45 (2) (2009) 288-297. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2008.12.002.

[509] Egghe L. An econometric property of the g-index. Information Processing & Management 45 (4) (2009) 484-489. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.04.001.

[527] Egghe L. Mathematical derivation of the impact factor distribution . Journal of Informetrics 3 (4) (2009) 290-295. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.01.004 .

[538] Egghe L. A rationale for the Hirsch-index rank-order distribution and a comparison with the impact factor rank-order distribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (10) (2009) 2142-2144. doi:10.1002/asi.21121.

[555] Egghe L. Performance and its relation with productivity in Lotkaian systems. Scientometrics 81 (2) (2009) 567-585. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2226-1.

[559] Egghe L. Comparative study of h-index sequences. Scientometrics 81 (2) (2009) 311-320. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2170-0.

[580] Egghe L. Lotkaian informetrics and applications to social networks. Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society-Simon Stevin 16 (4) (2009) 689-703.

[561] Egghe L., Liang L.M., Rousseau R. A Relation Between h-Index and Impact Factor in the Power-Law Model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11) 2362-2365. doi:10.1002/asi.21144.

[551] Franceschet M. A Cluster Analysis of Scholar and Journal Bibliometric Indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (10) (2009) 1950-1964. doi:10.1002/asi.21152.

[588] Franceschini F., Maisano D. The Hirsch Index in Manufacturing and Quality Engineering. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 25 (8) (2009) 987-995. doi:10.1002/qre.1016.

[525] Gagolewski M. A remark on limit properties of generalized h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics 3 (4) (2009) 367-368. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.02.001.

[569] Gagolewski M., Grzegorzewski P. A geometric approach to the construction of scientific impact indices. Scientometrics 81 (3) (2009) 617-634. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2253-y.

[564] Garcia-Perez M.A. The Hirsch h Index in a Non-Mainstream Area: Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences in Spain. Spanish Journal of Psychology 12 (2) (2009) 833-849.

[566] Garcia-Perez M.A. A multidimensional extension to Hirsch's h-index. Scientometrics 81 (3) (2009) 779-785. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2290-1.

[497] Gianoli E., Molina-Montenegro M.A. Insights Into the Relationship Between the h-Index and Self-Citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (6) (2009) 1283-1285. doi:10.1002/asi.21042.

[484] Gisbert J.P., Panes J. Scientific publication, bibliometric indicators, and Hirsch's h-index. Gastroenterologia y Hepatologia 32 (3) (2009) 140-149. doi:10.1016/j.gastrohep.2008.09.024.

[552] Gisbert J.P., Panes J. The Hirsch's h-index: a new tool for measuring scientific production. Cirugia Española 86 (4) (2009) 193-195. doi:10.1016/j.ciresp.2009.05.007.

[216] Glanzel W. The multi-dimensionality of journal impact. Scientometrics 78 (2) (2009) 355-374. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2166-9.

[574] Glanzel W., Schubert A. Hirsch-type characteristics of the tail of distributions. The generalised h-index. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2009) 118-123. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.002.

[212] Guan J.C., Gao X. Exploring the h-Index at Patent Level. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (1) (2009) 35-40. doi:10.1002/asi.20954.

[196] Guns R., Rousseau R. Simulating growth of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (2) (2009) 410-417. doi:10.1002/asi.20973.

[197] Guns R., Rousseau R. Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index. Journal of Informetrics 3 (1) (2009) 64-71. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.004.

[232] Harnad S.. Open access scientometrics and the UK Research Assessment Exercise. Scientometrics 79 (1) (2009) 147-156. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0409-z.

[214] Hartemink A.E. Publications for evaluations: The impact of soil science and soil scientists. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64 (1) (2009) 18A-19A. doi:10.2489/jswc.64.1.18A.

[548] He Z.L. International Collaboration Does Not Have Greater Epistemic Authority. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (10) (2009) 2151-2164. doi:10.1002/asi.21150.

[590] Horne R., Petrie K.J., Wessely S. H-index pathology: implications for medical researchers and practitioners. British Medical Journal 339 (2009) b5356. doi:10.1136/bmj.b5356.

[546] Hsieh P.N., Chang P.L. An assessment of world-wide research productivity in production and operations management. International Journal of Production Economics 120 (2) (2009) 540-551. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.015.

[495] Hunter R.S., Oswald A.J., Charlton B.G. The Elite Brain Drain. Economic Journal 119 (538) (2009) 231-251. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02274.x.

[554] Jacso P. The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus. Online Information Review 33 (4) (2009) 831-837. doi:10.1108/14684520910985756.

[217] Jasienski M. Garfield's demon and "surprising" or "unexpected" results in science. Scientometrics 78 (2) (2009) 347-353. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1979-2.

[223] Jensen P., Rouquier J.B., Croissant Y. Testing bibliometric indicators by their prediction of scientists promotions. Scientometrics 78 (3) (2009) 467-479. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2014-3.

[501] Jeong S., Lee S., Kim H.G. Are You an Invited Speaker? A Bibliometric Analysis of Elite Groups for Scholarly Events in Bioinformatics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (6) (2009) 1118-1131. doi:10.1002/asi.21056.

[224] Johnston R. The extent of influence: An alternative approach to identifying dominant contributors to a discipline's literature. Scientometrics 78 (3) (2009) 409-420. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2015-2.

[227] Jokic M. H-index as a new scientometric indicator. Biomechia Medica 19 (1) (2009) 5-9.

[487] Katsaros D., Akritidis L., Bozanis P. The f Index: Quantifying the Impact of Coterminal Citations on Scientists' Ranking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (5) (2009) 1051-1056. doi:10.1002/asi.21040.

[560] Kim P.J., Lee J.Y., Park J.H. Developing a New Collection-Evaluation Method: Mapping and the User-Side h-Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11) (2009) 2366-2377. doi:10.1002/asi.21159.

[488] Korn A., Schubert A., Telcs A. Lobby index in networks. Physica A-Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388 (11) (2009) 2221-2226. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.02.013.

[526] Kosmulski M. New seniority-independent Hirsch-type index . Journal of Informetrics 3 (4) (2009) 341-347. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.003.

[573] Kousha K., Thelwall M. Rezaie S. Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics 4 (1) (2009) 124-135. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.003.

[490] Kumar M.J. Evaluating Scientists: Citations, Impact Factor, h-Index, Online Page Hits and What Else. IETE Technical Review 26 (3) (2009) 165-168. doi:10.4103/0256-4602.50699.

[518] Lee J., Kraus K.L., Couldwell W.T. Use of the h index in neurosurgery Clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery 111 (2) (2009) 387-392. doi:10.3171/2008.10.JNS08978.

[210] Levitt J.M., Thelwall M. The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics 78 (1) (2009) 45-67. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1927-1.

[504] Leydesdorff L. How are New Citation-Based Journal Indicators Adding to the Bibliometric Toolbox?. Journal of the American of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (7) (2009) 1327-1336. doi:10.1002/asi.21024.

[570] Lippi G. The impact factor for evaluating scientists: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 47 (12) (2009) 1585-1586. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2009.352.

[510] Liu Y.X., Rao I.K.R. Empirical series of journal h-indices: The JCR category Horticulture as a case study. Scientometrics 80 (1) (2009) 59-74. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2026-z.

[492] Liu Y.X., Rousseau R. Properties of Hirsch-type indices: the case of library classification categories. Scientometrics 79 (2) (2009) 235-248. doi:10.1142/10.1007/s11192-009-0415-1.

[500] Marchant T. Score-Based Bibliometric Rankings of Authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (6) (2009) 1132-1137. doi:10.1002/asi.21059.

[512] Marchant T. An axiomatic characterization of the ranking based on the h-index and some other bibliometric rankings of authors. Scientometrics 80 (2) (2009) 325-342. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2075-y.

[507] Markusova V.A., Ivanov V.V., Varshabskii A.E. Bibliometric indicators of Russian Science and of the Russian Academy of Sciences (1997-2007). Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 79 (3) (2009) 197-204. doi:10.1134/S1019331609030010.

[220] Marx W. The anatomy of the International Journal of Materials Research in the light of bibliometry. International Journal of Materials Research 100 (1) (2009) 11-23. doi:10.3139/146.101793.

[483] Meyer V.R. The h Index - Help or Hype?. Chimia 63 (1-2) (2009) 66-68. doi:10.2533/chimia.2009.66.

[519] Mingers J. Measuring the research contribution of management academics using the Hirsch-index. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60 (9) (2009) 1143-1153. doi:10.1057/jors.2008.94.

[225] Moed H.F. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum Immunologiae Et Therapiae Experimentalis 57 (1) (2009) 13-18. doi:10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5.

[531] Morel C.M., Serruya S.J., Penna G.O., Guimaraes R.. Co-authorship Network Analysis: A Powerful Tool for Strategic Planning of Research, Development and Capacity Building Programs on Neglected Diseases. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3 (8) (2009) e501. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000501.

[481] Narukawa Y., Torra V. Multidimensional generalized fuzzy integral. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160 (6) (2009) 802-815. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2008.10.006.

[541] Ozcinar Z. The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980-2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 25 (4) (2009) 559-580.

[568] Panaretos J., Malesios C. Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics 81 (3) (2009) 635-670. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2174-9.

[226] Pendlebury D.A. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Archivum immunologia Et Therapiae Experimentalis 57 (1) (2009) 1-11. doi:10.1007/s00005-009-0008-y.

[231] Perianes-Rodriguez A., Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z., Vargas-Quesada B., Gomez C.O., Moya-Anegon F. Synthetic hybrid indicators based on scientific collaboration to quantify and evaluate individual research results. Journal of Informetrics 3 (2) (2009) 91-101. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.12.001.

[505] Pislyakov V. Comparing two "thermometers": Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus. Scientometrics 79 (3) (2009) 541-550. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2016-1.

[230] Quesada A. Monotonicity and the Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics 3 (2) (2009) 158-160. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.01.002.

[517] Quindos G. Confusing the confused: thoughts on impact factor, h(irsch) index, Q value, and other cofactors that influence the researcher's happiness. Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia 26 (2) (2009) 97-102.

[581] Rand D.G., Pfeiffer T. Systematic Differences in Impact across Publication Tracks at PNAS. Plos One 4 (12) (2009) e8092. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008092.

[520] Retzer V., Jurasinski G. Towards objectivity in research evaluation using bibliometric indicators - A protocol for incorporating complexity. Basic and Applied Ecology 10 (5) (2009) 393-400. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2008.09.001.

[530] Rodriguez-Navarro A. Sound Research, Unimportant Discoveries: Research, Universities, and Formal Evaluation of Research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (9) (2009) 1845-1858. doi:10.1002/asi.21104.

[523] Romero Garcia A., Cortes J.N., Escudero C., Lopez J.A.F., Moreno J.A.C. Measuring the influence of clinical trials citations on several bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 80 (3) (2009) 747-760. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2108-6.

[562] Rons N., Amez L. Impact vitality: an indicator based on citing publications in search of excellent scientists. Research Evaluation 18 (3) (2009) 233-241. doi:10.3152/095820209X470563.

[553] Rousseau R. The h-index as a biodiversity index. Current Science 97 (7) (2009) 980-981.

[524] Ruane F.P., Tol R.S.J. A Hirsch measure for the quality of research supervision, and an illustration with trade economists. Scientometrics 80 (3) (2009) 613-624. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2092-x.

[498] Schreiber M. A Case Study of the Modified Hirsch Index h(m) Accounting for Multiple Coauthors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (6) (2009) 1274-1282. doi:10.1002/asi.21057.

[545] Schreiber M. The influence of self-citation corrections and the fractionalised counting of multi-authored manuscripts on the Hirsch index. Annalen der Physik 18 (9) (2009) 607-621. doi:10.1002/andp.200910360.

[549] Schreiber M. Fractionalized Counting of Publications for the g-Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (10) (2009) 2145-2150. doi:10.1002/asi.21119.

[215] Schubert A. Hirsch-type indices for characterizing networks. Scientometrics 78 (2) (2009) 375-382. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2218-1.

[221] Schubert A. Using the h-index for assessing single publications. Scientometrics 78 (3) (2009) 559-565. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2208-3 .

[567] Sierra-Flores M.M., Guzman M.V., Raga A.C., Perez I. The productivity of Mexican astronomers in the field of outflows from young stars. Scientometrics 81 (3) (2009) 765-777. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2264-8.

[222] Skilton P.F. Does the human capital of teams of natural science authors predict citation frequency?. Scientometrics 78 (3) (2009) 525-542. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1953-z.

[543] Stock W.G. The Inflation of Impact Factors of Scientific Journals. Chemphyschem 10 (13) (2009) 2193-2196. doi:10.1002/cphc.200900495.

[511] Sypsa V., Hatzakis A. Assessing the impact of biomedical research in academic institutions of disparate sizes. BMC Medical Research Methodology 9 (2009) 33. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-33.

[533] Thompson D.R., Watson R. Editorial: Rating research performance. Journal of Clinical Nursing 18 (20) (2009) 2781-2782. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02926.x.

[489] Todd P.A. Ambiguity, bias, and compromise: an abc of bibliometric-based performance indicators Introduction. Environment and Planning A 41 (4) (2009) 765-771. doi:10.1068/a424.

[513] Tol R.S.J. The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics 80 (2) (2009) 317-324. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2079-7.

[544] Truex D., Cuellar M., Takeda H. Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the Discourse. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (7) (2009) 560-594.

[535] van Eck N.J., Waltman L. On the proper understanding of the limiting behavior of generalizations of the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics 3 (4) (2009) 369-370. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.02.002.

[491] Vinkler P. Introducing the Current Contribution Index for characterizing the recent, relevant impact of journals. Scientometrics 79 (2) (2009) 409-420. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0427-x.

[542] Vinkler P. The pi-index: a new indicator for assessing scientific impact. Journal of Information Science 35 (5) (2009) 602-612. doi:10.1177/0165551509103601.

[536] Waltman L., van Eck N.J. Some comments on Egghe's derivation of the impact factor distribution. Journal of Informetrics 3 (4) (2009) 363-366. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.004.

[594] Waltman L., van Eck N.J. A simple alternative to the h-index. ISSI Newsletter 5 (3) (2009) 46-48.

[494] Williamson J.R. My h-index Turns 40: My Midlife Crisis of Impact. ACS Chemical Biology 4 (5) (2009) 311-313. doi:10.1021/cb9001014.

[499] Woeginger G.J. Generalizations of Egghe's g-Index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (6) (2009) 1267-1273. doi:10.1002/asi.21061.

[556] Wohlin C. A new index for the citation curve of researchers. Scientometrics 81 (2)(2009) 521-533. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2155-z.

[550] Yan E.J., Ding Y. Applying Centrality Measures to Impact Analysis: A Coauthorship Network Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (10) (2009) 2107-2118. doi:10.1002/asi.21128.

[558] Ye F.Y. An investigation on mathematical models of the h-index. Scientometrics 81 (2) (2009) 493-498. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2169-6.

[529] Yu L.P., Chen Y.Q. Research on the evaluation of academic journals based on structural equation modeling. Journal of Informetrics 3 (4) (2009) 304-311. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.002.

[528] Yu L.P., Shen X.M., Pan Y.T., Wu Y.S. Scholarly journal evaluation based on panel data analysis. Journal of Informetrics 3 (4) (2009) 312-320. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.003.

[565] Yu Q., Han W.D., Wang Y.L., Wei K.N., Zhao S.H., Yang P.H., Enqi L. How Effective Use Hirsch Index to Assess a Journal? A Study of Evaluation the Hirsch Index of Chinese Medical Journal. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8 (12) (2009) 2485-2488.

[582] Zhang C.T. The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations. PLoS ONE (2009) 4(5):e5429. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005429.

[502] Zhang C.T. A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank. EMBO Reports 10 (5) (2009) 416-417. doi:10.1038/embor.2009.74.

[547] Zhao H.Y., Li X.L. H-Trust: A Group Trust Management System for Peer-to-Peer Desktop Grid. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 24 (5) (2009) 833-843.

[503] Zhou X.P., Yang G.X. Using Extended R-Impact to Assess Journal Influence. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 58 (2) (2009) 317-323. doi:10.1109/TR.2009.2020118.

2008 (83 papers)

[146] Alcalde G.G., Gomez M.C., Zurian J.C.V., Benavent R.A. Scientific literature by Spanish authors on the analysis of citations and impact factor in Biomedicine (1981-2005). Revista Española de Documentación Científica 31 (3) (2008) 344-365.

[160] Anderson T.R., Hankin R.K.S., Killworth P.D. Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics 76 (3) (2008) 577-588. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2071-2.

[204] Anon. Papers about papers. Nature Nanotechnology 3 (11) (2008) 633-633. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.322.

[112] Antonakis J., Lalive R. Quantifying scholarly impact: IQp versus the Hirsch h. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (6) 956-969. doi:10.1002/asi.20802.

[100] Arencibia-Jorge R., Barrios-Almaguer I., Fernandez-Hernandez S., Carvajal-Espino R. Applying successive H indices in the institutional evaluation: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (1) (2008) 155-157. doi:10.1002/asi.20729.

[158] Ball P. A longer paper gathers more citations. Nature 455 (7211) (2008) 274-275. doi:10.1038/455274a.

[208] Baneyx A. "Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history. Archivum Immunologiae Et Therapiae Experimentalis 56 (6) (2008) 363-371. doi:10.1007/s00005-008-0043-0.

[106] Bar-Ilan J. Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 74 (2) (2008) 257-271. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y .

[111] Bar-Ilan J. Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review. Journal of Informetrics 2 (1) (2008) 1-52. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001.

[134] Bar-Ilan J. The h-index of h-index and of other informetric topics. Scientometrics 75 (3) (2008) 591-605. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1880-z.

[108] Bornmann L., Mutz R., Daniel H.D. Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Society Science and Technology 59 (5) (2008) 830-837. doi:10.1002/asi.20806.

[138] Bornmann L., Wallon G., Ledin A. Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data. Research Evaluation 17 (2) 149-156. doi:10.3152/095820208X319166.

[169] Costas R., Bordons M. Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics 77 (2) (2008) 267-288. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0.

[113] de Araujo A.F.P. Increasing discrepancy between absolute and effective indexes of research output in a Brazilian academic department. Scientometrics 74 (3) (2008) 425-437. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1817-6 .

[161] Dodson M.V. Research paper citation record keeping: It is not for wimps. Journal of Animal Science 86 (10) (2008) 2795-2796. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1172.

[515] Duffy R.D., Martin H.M., Bryan N.A., Raque-Bogdan T.L. Measuring Individual Research Productivity: A Review and Development of the Integrated Research Productivity Index. Journal of Consueling Psychology 55 (4) (2008) 518-527. doi:10.1037/a0013618.

[122] Egghe L. Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices. Journal of Informetrics 2 (2) 136-148. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.12.003.

[129] Egghe L. The Influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (8) (2008) 1304-1312. doi:10.1002/asi.20823.

[140] Egghe L. The influence of merging on h-type indices. Journal of Informetrics 2 (3) 252-262. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.06.002.

[144] Egghe L. Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (10) (2008) 1608-1616. doi:10.1002/asi.20845.

[172] Egghe L. Modelling successive h-indices. Scientometrics 77 (3) (2008) 377-387. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1968-5.

[130] Egghe L., Rao I.K.R. Study of different h-indices for groups of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (8) (2008) 1276-1281. doi:10.1002/asi.20809.

[143] Egghe L., Rao I.K.R. The influence of the broadness of a query of a topic on its h-index: Models and examples of the h-index of N-grams. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (10) 1688-1693. doi:10.1002/asi.20843.

[115] Egghe L., Rousseau R. An h-index weighted by citation impact. Information Processing & Management 44 (2) (2008) 770-780. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.003.

[128] Engqvist L., Frommen J.G. The h-index and self-citations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23 (5) 250-252. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.009.

[164] Glanzel W. On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-index. Scientometrics 77 (1) (2008) 187-196. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1989-0.

[171] Glanzel W. H-index concatenation. Scientometrics 77 (2) (2008) 369-372. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2104-x.

[211] Gowrishankar J., Divakar P. Scientometrics and modified h-indices. Current Science 95 (12) (2008) 1656-1656.

[167] Gracza T., Somoskovi E. Research papers in the crosshairs: Newer viewpoints on the development of library resources. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services 32 (1) (2008) 42-45. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2008.06.002.

[118] Guan J., Gao X. Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics 75 (2) (2008) 357-379. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1871-0.

[166] Hendrix D. An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes of Health funding, and faculty size at Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools, 1997-2007. Journal of the Medical Library Association 96 (4) (2008) 324-334. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.007.

[131] Jacso P. The plausibility of computing the h-index of scholarly productivity and impact using reference-enhanced databases. Online Information Review 32 (2) (2008) 266-283. doi:10.1108/14694520810879872.

[147] Jacso P. The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar. Online Information Review 32 (3) (2008) 437-452. doi:10.1108/14694520810889718.

[157] Jacso P. Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster. Library Trends 56 (4) (2008) 784-815.

[205] Jacso P. The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Web of Science. Online Information Review 32 (5) (2008) 673-688. doi:10.1108/14684520810914043.

[136] Jarvelin K., Persson O. The DCI index: Discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (9) 1433-1440. doi:10.1002/asi.20847.

[126] Jones A.W. Hirsch-index for winners of TIAFT's mid-career achievement award. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 32 (4) (2008) 327-328.

[201] Kellner A., Ponciano L. H-index in the Brazilian Academy of Sciences - comments and concerns. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 80 (4) (2008) 771-781.

[163] Krestin G.P. Evaluating the Quality of Radiology Research: What Are the Rules of the Game?. Radiology 249 (2) (2008) 418-424. doi:10.1148/radiol.2491080832.

[139] Lehmann S., Jackson A.D., Lautrup B.E. A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance. Scientometrics 76 (2) 369-390. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1868-8.

[162] Levitt J.M., Thelwall M. Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (12) (2008) 1973-1984. doi:10.1002/asi.20914.

[99] Leydesdorff L. Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (2) (2008) 278-287. doi:10.1002/asi.20743.

[142] Liu Y.X., Rousseau R. Definitions of time series in citation analysis with special attention to the h-index. Journal of Informetrics 2 (3) 202-210. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.04.003.

[155] Maslov S., Redner S. Promise and Pitfalls of Extending Google's PageRank Algorithm to Citation Networks. The Journal of Neuroscience 28 (44) (2008) 11103-11105. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0002-08.2008.

[151] Meho L.I., Rogers Y. Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (11) (2008) 1711-1726. doi:10.1002/asi.20874.

[119] Molinari A., Molinari J.F. Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index. Scientometrics 75 (2) (2008) 339-356. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1872-z.

[120] Molinari J.F., Molinari A. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics 75 (1) 163-174. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1853-2.

[114] Mugnaini R., Packer A.L., Meneghini R. Comparison of scientists of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences and of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA on the basis of the h-index. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 41 (4) (2008) 258-262.

[200] Neuhaus C., Daniel H.D. Data sources for performing citation analysis - an overview. Journal of Documentation 64(2) (2009) 193-210.

[107] Pandit J.J. Anaesthetic research in the United Kingdom: publishing or perishing?. Anaesthesia 63 (3) (2008) 225-227. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05473.x.

[207] Pilc A. The use of citation indicators to identify and support high-quality research in Poland. Archivum Immunologiae Et Therapiae Experimentalis 56 (6) (2008) 381-384. doi:10.1007/s00005-008-0042-1.

[125] Pringle J. Trends in the use of ISI citation databases for evaluation. Learned Publishing 21 (2) (2008) 85-91. doi:10.1087/095315108X288901.

[156] Radicchi F., Fortunato S., Castellano C. Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (45) (2008) 17268-17272. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806977105.

[583] Riikonen P., Vihinen M. National research contributions: A case study on Finnish biomedical research. Scientometrics 77 (2) (2008) 207-222. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1962-y.

[110] Rodriguez V., Janssens F., Debackere K., De Moor B. On material transfer agreements and visibility of researchers in biotechnology. Journal of Informetrics 2 (1) (2008) 89-100. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.10.003.

[175] Rousseau R. Woeginger's axiomatisation of the h-index and its relation to the g-index, the h⁽²⁾-index and the R²-index. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4) (2008) 263-372. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.001.

[203] Rousseau R., Jin B. The Age-Dependent h-Type AR(2)-Index: Basic Properties and a Case Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (14) (2008) 2305-2311. doi:10.1002/asi.20928.

[202] Rousseau R., Rons N. Another h-type index for institutional evaluation. Current Science 95 (9) (2008) 1103-1103.

[150] Rousseau R., Ye F.Y. A proposal for a dynamic h-type index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (11) 1853-1855. doi:10.1002/asi.20890.

[117] Ruane F., Tol R.S.J. Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland. Scientometrics 75 (2) 395-405. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1869-7.

[123] Sanderson M. Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (7) (2008) 1184-1190. doi:10.1002/asi.20771.

[109] Satyanarayana K., Sharma A. Impact factor: Time to move on. Indian Journal of Medical Research 127 (1) (2008) 4-6. Link to paper

[116] Schreiber M. To share the fame in a fair way, h(m) modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts. New Journal of Physics 10 (2008) 040201. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/4/040201.

[133] Schreiber M. The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe's g index. Scientometrics 76 (1) (2008) 187-200. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1886-6.

[135] Schreiber M. An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-Index, the A-index, and the R-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (9) (2008) 1513-1522. doi:10.1002/asi.20856.

[141] Schreiber M. A modification of the h-index: The h(m)-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts. Journal of Informetrics 2 (3) 211-216. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.001.

[206] Sebire N.J. H-index and impact factors: assessing the clinical impact of researchers and specialist journals. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 32 (7) (2008) 843-845. doi:10.1002/uog.6266.

[165] Slafer G.A. Should crop scientists consider a journal's impact factor in deciding where to publish?. European Journal of Agronomy 29 (4) (2008) 208-212. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2008.07.001.

[149] Thelwall M. Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science 34 (4) (2008) 605-621. doi:10.1177/0165551507087238.

[121] Tol R.S.J. A rational, successive g-index applied to economics departments in Ireland. Journal of Informetrics 2 (2) (2008) 149-155. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.01.001.

[132] Torra V., Narukawa Y. The h-index and the number of citations: Two fuzzy integrals. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 16 (3) 795-797. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2007.896327.

[159] Van Driel M.L., Magin P.J., Del Mar C.B. Journal impact factor and its importance for AFP. Australian Family Physician 37 (9) (2008) 770-773.

[177] van Eck N.J., Waltman L. Generalizing the h- and g-indices. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4) (2008) 263-271. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.004.

[137] van Leeuwen T. Testing the validity of the Hirsch-index for research assessment purposes. Research Evaluation 17 (2) 157-160. doi:10.3152/095820208X319175.

[148] Vanclay J.K. Gauging the impact of journals. Forest Ecoloty and Management 256 (4) (2008) 507-509. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.020.

[178] Vanclay J.K. Ranking forestry journals using the h-index. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4) (2008) 326-334. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.002.

[145] Winter C.E. Quantitative analysis of indexed publications on seventeen model organisms in nine countries, from 1974 to 2006. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (10) (2008) 1598-1607. doi:10.1002/asi.20882.

[154] Woeginger G.J. An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index. Mathematical Social Sciences 56 (2) (2008) 224-232. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.03.001.

[173] Woeginger G.J. A symmetry axiom for scientific impact indices. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4) (2008) 298-303. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.001.

[174] Woeginger G.J. An axiomatic analysis of Egghe’s g-index. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4) (2008) 264-268. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.002.

[176] Ye F.Y., Rousseau R. The power law model and total career h-index sequences. Journal of Informetrics 2 (4) (2008) 288-297. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.09.002.

[170] Zhivotovsky L.A., Krutovsky K.V. Self-citation can inflate h-index. Scientometrics 77 (2) (2008) 373-375. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-1716-2.

[209] Zhuo M. Z factor: a new index for measuring academic research output. Molecular Pain 4 (2008) 53. doi:10.1186/1744-8069-4-53.

2007 (51 papers)

[77] Al-Awqati Q. Impact factors and prestige. Kidney International 71 (3) (2007) 183-185. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5002094.

[76] Aleixandre-Benavent R., Valderrama-Zuritan J.C., Gonzalez-Alcaide G. Scientific journals impact factor: limitations and alternative indicators. Profesional de la Información 16 (1) (2007) 4-11. doi:10.3145/epi.2007.jan.01.

[92] Ashkanasy N.M. Playing the citations game. Journal of Organizational Behavior 28 (6) (2007) 643-645. doi:10.1002/job.476 .

[71] Ball P. Achievement index climbs the ranks. Nature 448 (7155) (2007) 737-737. doi:10.1038/448737a.

[87] Beirlant J., Glanzel W., Carbonez A., Leemans H. Scoring research output using statistical quantile plotting. Journal of Informetrics 1 (3) (2007) 185-192. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.002.

[68] Berger M. The problematic ratings game in modern science. South African Journal Of Science 103 (1-2) (2007) 2-3.

[34] Bornmann L., Daniel H.D. What do we know about the h index?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (9) (2007) 1381-1385. doi:10.1002/asi.20609.

[89] Bornmann L., Daniel H.D. Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index: Extent of and reasons for type I and type II errors. Journal of Informetrics 1 (3) (2007) 204-213. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.01.002.

[63] Burrell Q.L. Hirsch index or Hirsch rate? Some thoughts arising from Liang’s data. Scientometrics 73 (1) (2007) 19-28. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-1774-5.

[101] Burrell Q.L. On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin's A-index. Journal of Informetrics 1 (2) (2007) 170-177. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.01.003..

[152] Burrell Q.L. Hirsch's h-index: A stochastic model. Journal of Informetrics 1 (1) 16-25. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.07.001.

[88] Costas R., Bordons M. The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics 1 (3) (2007) 193-203. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001.

[64] Csajbok E., Berhidi A., Vasas L., Schubert A. Hirsch-index for countries based on Essential Science Indicators data. Scientometrics 73 (1) (2007) 91-117. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1859-9.

[70] Dainesi S.M., Pietrobon R. Scientific indicators of productivity: time for action. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 29 (2) (2007) 100-101.

[96] de la Rosa J.L., Szymanski B.K. Selecting scientific papers for publication via citation auctions. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22 (6) (2007) 16-20.

[48] Egghe L. Dynamic h-index: The Hirsch index in function of time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (3) (2007) 452-454. doi:10.1002/asi.20473.

[53] Egghe L. Item-time-dependent Lotkaian informetrics and applications to the calculation of the time-dependent h-index and g-index. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 45 (7-8) (2007) 864-872. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2006.08.006.

[72] Egghe L., Rousseau R., Rousseau S. TOP-curves. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (6) (2007) 777-785. doi:10.1002/asi.20539.

[98] Ferrand L. Hirsch's h index: A new measure to quantify the research output of individual scientists. Annee Psychologique 107 (4) (2007) 531-536.

[52] Grupo Scimago. The Hirsch h index: its application to several of the most outstanding Spanish scientists. Profesional de la Información 16 (1) (2007) 47-49. doi:10.3145/epi.2007.jan.05.

[43] Heaney P.J. What's your h-index?. Elements 3 (4) (2007) 229-230.

[90] Hirsch J.E. Does the h-index have predictive power?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (2007) 19193-19198. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707962104.

[91] Iglesias J.E., Pecharroman C. Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields. Scientometrics 73 (2007) 303-320. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1805-x.

[50] Imperial J., Rodriguez-Navarro A. Usefulness of Hirsch's h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain. Scientometrics 71 (2) (2007) 271-282. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1665-4.

[44] Jeang K.T. Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?. Retrovirology 4 (42) (2007). doi:10.1186/1742-4690-4-42.

[45] Jin B.H., Liang L.M., Rousseau R., Egghe L. The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin 52 (6) (2007) 855-863. doi:10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9.

[85] Kieling C., Goncalves R.R.F. Assessing the quality of a scientific journal: the case of Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 29 (2) (2007) 177-181.

[104] Kim W.J., Seo J. Evaluation of an individual's scientific productivity using author rank. Information-An International Interdisciplinary Journal 10 (3) (2007) 365-372.

[75] Korfiatis N., Poulos M., Bokos G. Social metadata for the impact factor. The Electronic Library 25 (2) (2007) 166-175 .

[66] Lawrence P.A. The mismeasurement of science. Current Biology 17 (15) (2007) R583-R585. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.014.

[102] Lundberg J. Lifting the crown-citation z-score. Journal of Informetrics 1 (2) (2007) 145-154. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.09.007.

[51] Manafy M. Scopus harnesses the h-index - to increase the quality and reliability of citation tracking. Econtent 30 (3) (2007) 10-11.

[79] Meho L.I. The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World 20 (1) (2007) 32-36.

[95] Meho L.I., Yang K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (13) (2007) 2105-2125. doi:10.1002/asi.20677.

[97] Minasny B., Hartemink A.E., McBratney A. Soil science and the h index. Scientometrics 73 (3) (2007) 257-264. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1811-z.

[84] Nardone A. State and perspectives of national and international animal research. Italian Journal of Animal Science 6 (7-19) (2007) Suppl. 1.

[94] Olden J.D. How do ecological journals stack-up? Ranking of scientific quality according to the h index. Ecoscience 14 (3) (2007) 370-376.

[47] Oppenheim C. Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (2) (2007) 297-301. doi:10.1002/asi.20460.

[74] Pulina G., Francesconi A.H.D. Some bibliometric indexes for members of the Scientific Association of Animal Production (ASPA). Italian Journal of Animal Science 6 (1) (2007) 83-103.

[153] Rousseau R. The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index. Journal of Informetrics 1 (1) (2007) 2-7. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.05.001.

[49] Salgado J.F., Paez D. Scientific productivity and Hirsch's h index of Spanish social psychology: Convergence between productivity indexes and comparison with other areas. Psicothema 19 (2) (2007) 179-189.

[73] Schreiber M. Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index. Epl 78 (3) (2007) 30002. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/78/30002 .

[93] Schreiber M. A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists. Annalen der Physik 16 (9) (2007) 640-652. doi:10.1002/andp.20071025.

[78] Schubert A. Successive h-indices. Scientometrics 70 (1) (2007) 201-205. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-0112-x.

[179] Schubert A., Glanzel W. A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics 1 (3) (2007) 179-256. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.002 .

[69] Sidiropoulos A., Katsaros D., Manolopoulos Y. Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics 72 (2) (2007) 253-280. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1722-z.

[103] Soler J.M. A rational indicator of scientific creativity. Journal of Informetrics 1 (2) (2007) 123-130. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.10.004.

[65] Ursprung H.W., Zimmer M. Who is the "Platz-Hirsch" of the German economics profession? A citation analysis. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 227 (2) (2007) 187-208 . Link to paper

[42] Vanclay J.K. On the robustness of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (10) (2007) 1547-1550. doi:10.1002/asi.20616.

[62] Vinkler P. Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. Journal of Information Science 33 (4) (2007) 481-491. doi:10.1177/0165551506072165.

[41] Wendl M.C. H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature 449 (7161) (2007) 403-403. doi:10.1038/449403b.

2006 (24 papers)

[21] Banks M.G. An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics 69 (1) (2006) 161-168. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0146-5.

[22] Batista P.D., Campiteli M.G., Kinouchi O., Martinez A.S. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?. Scientometrics 68 (1) (2006) 179-189. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4.

[25] Braun T., Glanzel W., Schubert A. A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics 69 (1) (2006) 169-173. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4.

[82] Chapron G., Huste A. Open, Fair, and Free Journal Ranking for Researchers. Bioscience 56 (7) (2006) 558-559.

[23] Cronin B., Meho L.I. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57:9 (2006) 1275-1278. doi:10.1002/asi.20354.

[26] Egghe L. An informetric model for the Hirsch-index. Scientometrics 69 (1) (2006) 121-129. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0143-8.

[27] Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 69 (1) (2006) 131-152. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.

[60] Egghe L. How to improve the h-index. Scientist 20 (3) (2006) 15-15.

[35] Glanzel W. On the opportunities and limitations of the H-index. Science Focus 1 (1) (2006) 10-11.

[59] Glanzel W. On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics 67 (2) (2006) 315-321. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0102-4.

[24] Grupo Scimago. El índice h de Hirsch: aportaciones a un debate. El profesional de la información 15:4 (2006) 304-306. doi:10.3145/epi.2006.jul.08.

[36] Iglesias J.E., Pecharroman C. Scaling the h-Index for Different Scientific ISI Fields. Physics and Society arXiv:physics/0607224. Link to paper

[195] Jin B. h-index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus 1 (1) (2006) 8-9.

[30] Kelly C.D., Jennions M.D. The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21 (4) (2006) 167–170. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.005.

[28] Lehmann S., Jackson A.D., Lautrup B.E. Measures for measures. Nature 444 (2006), 1003 - 1004. doi:10.1038/4441003a.

[55] Liang L.M. h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics 69 (1) (2006) 153-159. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0145-6.

[81] Peña-Rey I., Perez-Farinos N., Marset Campos P. Scientific production on tetrachloro-dibenzo-dioxins: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics 69 (3) (2006) 639-650. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0174-1.

[38] Podlubny I., Kassayova K. Law of the constant ratio. Towards a better list of citation superstars: compiling a multidisciplinary list of highly cited researchers. Research Evaluation 15 (3) (2006) 154-162. doi:10.3152/147154406781775887.

[80] Prathap G. Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions' scientific research output. Current Science 91 (11) (2006) 1439-1439.

[56] Purvis A. The h index: playing the numbers game. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21 (8) (2006) 422-422. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.014.

[54] Saad G. Exploring the h-index at the author and journal levels using bibliometric data of productive consumer scholars and business-related journals respectively. Scientometrics 69 (1) (2006) 117-120. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0142-9.

[32] Symonds M.R., Gemmell N.J., Braisher T.L., Gorringe K.L., Elgar M.A. Gender differences in publication output: towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS ONE (2006) 1:e127. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000127.

[40] van Raan A.F.J. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics 67 (3) (2006) 491-502. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0066-4.

[58] Vanclay J.K. Refining the h-index. Scientist 20 (7) (2006) 14-15.

2005 (8 papers)

[31] . Impact factor. Science 309 (5738) (2005) 1181. Link to paper

[194] Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature 436 (7053) (2005) 900. doi:10.1038/436900a.

[33] Bornmann L., Daniel H.D. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?. Scientometrics 65 (3) (2005) 391-392. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4.

[61] Dume B. How high is your h-index?. Physics World 18 (9) (2005) 7-7.

[83] Frangopol P.T. The Hirsch index - a new scientometric indicator for the evaluation of the results of a scientific researcher. Revista de Chimie 56 (12) (2005) 1279-1281.

[18] Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (2005) 16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102.

[37] Podlubny I. Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science. Scientometrics 64 (1) (2005) 95-99. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0240-0.

[29] Vaidya J.S. V-index: A fairer index to quantify an individual 's research output capacity. British Medical Journal 331 (2005) 1339-c-1340-c. Link to paper